Meet the New Boss - Larken Rose
How can someone who wants to rule the world do so with "humility"?
January 20, 2009 - I just finished subjecting myself to the nauseating experience of listening to a bunch tyrant propaganda, also known as the "inaugural ceremonies," celebrating the coronation of Barrack Obama as the new King of America. (To call him a "President" would imply that this is still a constitutional republic, and that there are limits on what "government" can do to us. It's not, and there aren't, so I'll call him what he is: a king.)
In short, as in every such ridiculous exhibitions of authority-worship, there was a long stream of lies, and not a speck of truth to be found. In the preliminary bunk, Diane Feinstein, subject-disarmer and communist extraordinaire, was nice enough to inform us all that "the freedom of the people to choose their leaders" is the heart of liberty. That one insane sentence deserves many pages of rebuttal, but for now I'll just say: to call those who forcibly control you "leaders" is insane, and it is utterly idiotic to think that choosing WHICH person will enslave you counts as being free.
Even the "invocation" had a fair number of similar insane contradictions, such as the pastor hoping that Obama will "lead us with humility." How, exactly, can someone who wants to rule the world, and who thinks he has the right to forcibly rob and control the rest of us, do so with "humility"? What a looney notion. The pastor further hoped aloud that we would show "civility in our attitudes, even when we differ." By itself, that would be fine, but in the context of appointing someone to use the VIOLENCE of the state to COERCE us all into doing what HE wants, it's a little beyond hypocritical. For example, the thugs in the federal government and I "differ" on where the money I earn should be spent. Most of you know how "civil" they were in dealing with that difference of opinion (if you don't, go buy my book at www.kickingthedragon.com), and the Obama regime will be no different. The pastor also opined that as Americans, we are united by our "commitment to freedom." That was a little much to take, considering that he was surrounded by the biggest club of megalomaniac control freaks on the planet, while throngs of stupid peasants cheered at the prospect of their own enslavement.
Then came the main course: the king himself, lying through his teeth about what he believes, what he wants, and what he intends to do. Like a good tyrant, he constantly used words like "we," "us" and "our" (about a hundred times in the relatively short speech). He spoke of "the task before us," and "the challenges we face." Most bizarrely, he spoke about what great things "free men and women can achieve."
