Of Evolutionary Engagement
The Victory Against You in the Silent War is Your Silence
Mandatory Vaccines . . . except.
- California Assembly approves one of the toughest mandatory vaccination laws in the nation California lawmakers on Thursday approved one of the toughest mandatory vaccination requirements in the nation, moving to end exemptions from state immunization laws based on religious or other personal beliefs.
The measure, among the most controversial taken up by the Legislature this year, would require more children who enter day care and school to be vaccinated against diseases including measles and whooping cough.
Those with medical conditions such as allergies and immune-system deficiencies, confirmed by a physician, would be excused from immunization. And parents could still decline to vaccinate children who attend private home-based schools or public independent studies off campus.
The Santiago family had tried everything to help their 9-year-old autistic son Kalel Santiago. He had never spoken a single word in his whole life, but after only two days of using cannabis oil, that all changed.
The Santiago family lives in Puerto Rico where medical marijuana was illegal until this spring. In May, after Governor of Puerto Rico signed an executive order that legalized marijuana for medical purposes, they decided to take the leap and start Kalel on cannabis treatment, in spite of the legal risk.
When Kalel was only 10-months-old, Yahoo News reports “he was diagnosed with the rare childhood cancer neuroblastoma.”
As a result, he spent over two years undergoing surgery, as well as chemotherapy, and radiation treatments.
After exhausting these “treatments” the Santiago family received yet another diagnosis of non-verbal autism.
Abiel Gomez Santiago told Yahoo, “While he was in the hospital, we noticed he didn’t speak at all and had some behavior that wasn’t right, like hand flapping, and walking on his toes. But we waited until he was 3 and cancer-free to look at his behavior.”
Along with his wife, Gladys they tried to read up everything they could on non-verbal autism, as well as trying to implement any and all therapies. But with the legalization of medical marijuana impending, they discovered treatments using cannabis or “hemp” oil – utilizing the compound cannabidiol (CBD).
They found hundreds of stories about children being successfully treated with CBD, for epilepsy and autism.
After only two days of using a small spray bottle of cannabis oil, the family says that Kalel spoke for the first time ever.
We Sons of Confederate Veterans are charged with preserving the good name of the Confederate soldier. The world, for the most part, has acknowledged what Gen. R. E. Lee described in his farewell address as the “valour and devotion” and “unsurpassed courage and fortitude” of the Confederate soldier. The Stephen D. Lee Institute program is dedicated to that part of our duty that charges us not only to honour the Confederate soldier but “to vindicate the cause for which he fought.” We are here to make the case not only for the Confederate soldier but for his cause. It is useless to proclaim the courage, skill, and sacrifice of the Confederate soldier while permitting him to be guilty of a bad cause.
Although their cause was lost it was a good cause and still has a lot to teach the world today.
In this age of Political Correctness there has never been a greater need and greater opportunity to refresh our understanding of what happened in America in the years 1861–1865 and start defending our Southern forebears as strongly as they ought to be defended. There is plenty of true history available to us. It is our job to make it known.
The Minions of Darkness
Republican strategist Karl Rove said on “Fox News Sunday” the only way to stop gun-related violence, like the Wednesday massacre at Emmanuel African Methodist Church in Charleston S.C., was to repeal American citizens’ Second Amendment rights.
“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by consent or conquest.” –James Paul Warburg [son of Paul Warburg, the author of the Federal Reserve Act] February 7, 1950
“I think that his [Obama’s] task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a New World Order can be created.” —Henry Kissinger, CNBC 2008
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” —Strobe Talbot, Deputy Secretary of State, TIME, July l992
“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” —David Spangler, Director of UN Planetary Initiative, one of the founding fathers of the New Age movement
“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control. Do I mean a conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, incredibly evil in intent.” –Rep. Larry P. MacDonald, killed in Korean Air Lines 007, 1983
The Language of Evile
He’s done it again. This time ruling it doesn’t matter what the wording of a law says, it’s what the court thinks the people who wrote the law might have meant to say that matters.
“Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them,” Roberts declared in the majority opinion.
Limiting the subsidies only to individuals in states with their own exchanges could well push insurance markets in the other states “into a death spiral,” Roberts wrote.
It’s clear from Robert’s statement, the ruling ignored the wording of the law in order to save Obamacare, and by extension Obama’s legacy
That the plain language of the law saws that subsidies will only be granted to individuals enrolled in exchanges set up by the state … [Then Again, Go Define “State”]
Voluntary Slavery Expanded
The majority opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, held that “no union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were.” Kennedy added:
It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.
Roberts, who joined the majority in yesterday’s wrong-headed decision in King v. Burwell, was curiously circumspect in his dissent, writing:
If you are among the many Americans — of whatever sexual orientation — who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.
[And it Didn’t. Hear Why.]
- Obergefell recognizes the connection between liberty and equality. Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion echoes the opinion in Loving v. Virginia (1967), in that it recognizes both the liberty and the equality claims made by the plaintiffs. In Loving, the court recognized that the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause both required the states to recognize marriages between interracial couples. Unlike Loving, however, which largely treats the equality and liberty claims as parallel and independent claims, Obergefell treats them as intertwined. In a self-conscious reinforcement of Lawrence v. Texas (which struck down sodomy statutes in 2003), Obergefell recognizes the connection between liberty and equality (“In Lawrence the Court acknowledged the interlocking nature of these constitutional safeguards in the legal treatment of gays and lesbians. … This dynamic also applies to same-sex marriage”).
- Breaking: Same-Sex Marriage Is a Constitutional Right as of 10 AM
The left in the court led by Justice Kennedy said all same-sex couples can marry in all 50 states and the Constitution gives them that right. It’s the highest liberty under the Constitution.
While the majority of the Justices found that it is the right of anyone to marry as of 10 AM, Justice Scalia and the minority court said they unconstitutionally rewrote the law at 10 AM.
- 5 Justices Just Trashed The Accumulated Knowledge of Mankind, and the Constitution 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.” The 45 Communist Goal Necessary To Destroy America.
George Washington, our first President viewed “sodomy” or homosexual relations with “Abhorrence and Detestation.”
As a member of the Virginia Legislature, Thomas Jefferson proposed a law that would punish homosexual males by castration and a half inch hole drilled through the nose cartridge of lesbians. His colleagues disagreed, hanging was faster and cheaper. When our Constitution was written homosexuality was a hanging offense in all thirteen states. For a brief period Pennsylvania experimented with short prison terms, it took them less than 20 years to go back to hanging them.
Needless to say, back then, a discussion about gay marriage wouldn’t have ended well for supporters of the idea.
But five justices believe they know more that the collective knowledge of the human race..
In Federalist 84 Alexander Hamilton said. “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”
Marriage isn’t one of those powers, it is nowhere to be found in the Constitution. Today’s ruling was based on the 14th Amendment which says in Section 1:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The Men who wrote the 14th Amendment would have hung the court for today’s decision
The 14th Amendment was ratified following the Civil War and was designed strictly to insure that former slaves were granted the same rights as other citizens
In The Bum’s Rush
The Senate voted Wednesday to approve fast-track authority, securing a big second-term legislative win for President Obama after a months-long struggle.
The 60-38 Senate vote capped weeks of fighting over the trade bill, which pitted Obama against most of his party — including Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
Passage of the bill is also a big victory for GOP leaders in Congress, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). The Republican leaders worked closely with an administration they have more frequently opposed to nudge the trade bill over the goal line.
Labor unions and liberal Democrats had fought hard against the authority and are likely to now turn their attention toward stopping the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a trade deal Obama is negotiating with 11 other Pacific Rim nations.
Fast-track, or trade promotion authority, will allow the White House to send trade deals to Congress for up-or-down votes. The Senate will not be able to filibuster them, and lawmakers will not have the power to amend them.
The expedited process, which lasts until 2018 and can be extended until 2021, greatly increases Obama’s chances of concluding negotiations on the TPP, which is a top goal of the president’s. [Obama until 2021? ! ]
- Republicans to the Rescue It was an important victory for Obama, undoubtedly the biggest accomplishment of his second term. He gets credit for sticking with a treaty that his party and its interest groups loathe. He lobbied Democrats in the House and Senate.
Presidents have traditionally played an influential role in struggles over trade. But Obama’s role was small. He was expected to keep the minority of Democrats who support free trade from defecting—nothing more. “I give the president credit,” McConnell says. “He did reinforce those who intended to vote for it.” Their votes were crucial.
Finding The Jurisdictional Limitation
- High court sides with inmate in excessive force case
The Supreme Court is making it easier for inmates who are accused of crimes — but not yet convicted — to bring cases of excessive force against jail officials.
The justices on Monday ruled 5-4 in favor of a Wisconsin man who sued jail officers for civil rights violations after they used a Taser gun and other rough tactics while transferring him to another jail cell.
The incident involved Michael Kingsley, who was jailed pending trial on drug charges. He claimed he only had to show the officers were unreasonable in using force.
A lower court ruled Kingsley also had to prove the use of force was intentional, or at least reckless. But the Supreme Court agreed with Kingsley that he only needed to show the conduct was “objectively unreasonable.”
He was locked up for almost three decades for crimes he did not commit. But now a Virginia man is finally free after DNA tests exonerated him completely.
Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe just issued a complete and absolute pardon to Michael McAlister, 58.
“My staff and I have carefully and thoroughly reviewed the documentation in this case and concluded that a pardon is appropriate in light of the overwhelming evidence, including a recent confession by another individual, pointing to Mr. McAlister’s actual innocence of the crime for which he was convicted,” McAuliffe stated on Wednesday.
- The Pope’s Top Climate Change Advisor Does Not Believe In God – But He Does Appear To Believe In ‘Gaia’
What kind of people is Pope Francis surrounding himself with? The fact that this Pope decided to choose German professor John Schellnhuber as his chief climate change advisor is raising a lot of eyebrows. Schellnhuber doesn’t believe in God, but as you will see below, he does appear to believe in ‘Gaia’. Schellnhuber has also advocated for the establishment of an “Earth Constitution”, a “Global Council” directly elected by the citizens of the world, and a “Planetary Court” that would serve as the pinnacle of a planetary legal system. In addition, he believes that the “carrying capacity” of our planet is less than one billion people. This is the man that the Pope has chosen to advise him on the issue that Pope Francis has made the centerpiece of his papacy.
The concept of ‘Gaia’ has deep roots in ancient paganism. Many of the advocates of the ‘Gaia hypothesis‘ do not consider themselves to be religious, but in reality it is a kind of “scientific pantheism”. This quasi-scientific theory was popularized by James Lovelock in his book entitled “Gaia: A New Look At Life On Earth“, and apparently this is a theory that Schellnhuber endorses.
- Brother Glum, Mother Earth
Shortly after the Argentinian cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio was consecrated Pope Francis in 2013, news stories reported that the new pontiff wanted to build a stronger relationship between the Catholic Church and science—one that saw science not in opposition to, but compatible with, religious belief. Some months later, the pope declared that evolution and the Big Bang theory of creation are real and don’t conflict with belief in God. Now, in the wake of the pope’s encyclical on climate change and the environment, Laudato Si (or, Be Praised), the press has exulted in the pope’s apparent effort to find even more “common ground” with science.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The encyclical, whose title is derived from a line from St. Francis of Assisi’s Canticle of the Sun (“Be praised, My Lord, through all your Creatures”), is being welcomed by some in the scientific community because it proclaims that climate change is real and that humanity must address it. [Note: Climate changes denies existence of the sun as a causative source]
- Pentagon rewrites ‘Law of War’ declaring ‘belligerent’ journalists as legitimate targets
The Pentagon has released a book of instructions on the “law of war,” detailing acceptable ways of killing the enemy. The manual also states that journalists can be labeled “unprivileged belligerents,” an obscure term that replaced “enemy combatant.”
The 1,176-page “Department of Defense Law of War Manual” explains that shooting, exploding, bombing, stabbing, or cutting the enemy are acceptable ways of getting the job done, but the use of poison or asphyxiating gases is not allowed.
The depopulationists are on the move again, pushing hard for the elimination of six billion people on planet Earth in order to bring the planet down to what’s being touted as its “sustainable carrying capacity of one billion people.”
But this time, the depopulation agenda may be codified by the Vatican. Professor John Schellnhuber has been chosen as a speaker for the Vatican’s rolling out of a Papal document on climate change. He’s the professor who previously said the planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people. Now, the Vatican is giving him a platform which many expect will result in an official Church declaration in support of radical depopulation in the name of “climate science.”
“The teaching document, called an encyclical, is scheduled for release on June 18 at Vatican City,” reports Breitbart.com. “Perhaps with the exception of the 1968 encyclical on contraception, no Vatican document has been greeted with such anticipation.”
A new Planetary Court to hold power over all nations… one ring to rule them all
Schellnhuber daydreams about a “Planetary Court” guided by a new “Earth Constitution” which would hold power over every nation and government on the planet. As he explains himself in this document on HumansAndNature.org, he’s a proponent of an all-powerful, climate-focused world government that would rule over the planet… a literal “science dictatorship” based on whatever “science” the climate change proponents can fudge together each year.
Hot Diggity Doge
The Weekend War Report
The DOGE OF WAR
Unleash the Power of the DOGE OF WAR
Please Donate to RLM
In This Doge Eat Doge World
- The people know that they have created this farce and financed it with their own taxes (consent), but they would rather knuckle under than be the hypocrite.
Factor VI – Cattle
Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.
- Mr. Rothschild’s Energy Discovery
What Mr. Rothschild  had discovered was the basic principle of power, influence, and control over people as applied to economics. That principle is “when you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you.”
The Law of War
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE FIELD
Where Not Throwing Oppression Off, You Live Either Under an Occupation or by Conquest.
The Choice and Responsibility are Yours
United We Strike
Behind The Woodshed for that practical education & hard but necessary dose of reality.
Spread The Word Behind The Woodshed.